Sunday, July 26, 2009

Stage 2/3/4 Clearance

Hah. Like I said, a lil' bit of debating spirit instilled and time. I'm through 2nd, 3rd and 4th stage. Still have no clue what the hell am I talking about?

Your hint:
I administer pressurised liquid around my line, only to halt something when triggered;
I am something you can sit on, tho you are my engine;
I could be used to generate electricity, and people do use me for numerous get around benefits.

I think I gave you too much hints. So start guessing!

Monday, July 20, 2009

If You're Smart Enough

I'm going to let you in to a little rage I've been having for quite a while. A rage worth closing an eye upon for it to accumulate; a rage that has been socially inducted, yet almost no one gave perfect attention upon it; a rage that has reached it's certain boiling extent.

I won't make a different, I know, cause I'm just a social nobody right? I'm still in my teenage years of which I should be "carefree" and "joyous" about whatever sets foot upon my doorstep, agree? Be it yes or no,

I-don't-give-a-damn

I'm just voicing out what I know most would agree upon.

Pedagogues, general practitioners, advocates, artisans or just quacks. As I see it, are still flesh bolstering humans. Nothing they do or say can make them go above the control system - not above the law; not above the general practice border; not above the relevant mentioned.

Presently, they are seemingly much more daring - on by which they peruse THEN abuse the system. Take the mentioned Suzanne Lukas not long ago - Arrogant, Abusive, Discriminative, also the similar personalities of those pedagogues, general practitioners, advocates, artisans, or just quacks. I'm only tackling the minority, because the minority are the headbanging troublemakers.

I'm not personally someone who is entangled as a victim in such situation, but I'm in trouble alright, not only did the peruse then abuse of the system came about, I was brought down just because the other party had higher authority than me.

But what trouble? I'm in trouble for doing something good for another party. Ya you heard it, something good. They can't expect a photo finish for whatever they are gonna benefit from at the end of the process if they keep abusing the system.

Put it this way, e.g: I'm expected to buy them nandos for lunch BY lunch, but seemingly enough, as I get to my destination, I'm being called upon missing a general meeting with them. Something has gotta be sacrificed am I right? Lets just put away delivery services and what not, you'd get my figure.

My point is this: I don't create problems, the problems backfire. Sooner or later, people will realise how much of a dick they are, that's when the problem backfires to them.

Sometimes they can't be given full authority upon something without proper justification. They are "above-the-law" once given such glorious yet advantageous opportunity.

Hint: If You're Smart Enough

*Edit 1: To protect themselves, they are gonna twist and turn words around for my case, I second that!

Sunday, July 19, 2009

The existence of skirts. (Please enlighten me on this)

The "thisensuresidon'tgetfiredbyeveryoneeverywherejustbecausei'mcurious" Disclaimer:
I just want to know what makes a skirt something so different from regular pants apart from it's design and it's absence of 2 'tubes'. So if you can tell me, I'm all ears! This post is draggy, because I'm trying to put in the right words for it.
-----
Again Howie, how did you come up with this junk?
I was at lunch today with a couple of friends @ 1 Utama after orchestral practice. Knowing the norm of all girls, shopping centre = shops (d'uh) = clothes (oh no) = trying out (yikes) = 1 hour (damn), but above all, I'm fine with it.

As I settle on a nearest bench outside to allow my body to digest the whole cow I ate for lunch and yes, my imagination, once again, went wild (come on, that's not what I was thinking about) - coming up with a theory on the existence of skirts.

Here goes. Ever come to think that skirts, are just regular pants, without tubes (or something else they might call it elsewhere)? Yes true, they look more female-like now but it's because of it evolving as a female outfit. Yes, you tell them apart from a female wearing a skirt and a male wearing pants. But apart from that, the invention of skirts?

Hey it could be some dude named "Thompson McSkirt" or "Skirt Lee Ha Ha". He was ever so careful on slipping his legs in to his pants into the right tube - I mean, he couldn't jump in his pants, to prevent from ripping his pants into half as he steps on the centre piece; neither could he just slip it on without first determining the centre piece.

For an average of 365 1/4 days in a year, for 35 years of his life ever since he knew how to wear pants, he had been this cautious. He was not born with a silver spoon in his mouth, and times were harsh those days, he could not afford to buy pants, eventho they were ripped from tube up.

So to save the embarrassment of running around with ripped pants, he was very very cautious. Yes you guys get the point. He got lazy eventually, and decided to rip the centre piece away, sewing together the 2 tubes for very obvious reasons.

That went global. Benefits added made his life so much easier, he could jump into them and not worry about ripping it into half. He could change his pair of "pants" before anyone could shout "naked" out loud. and NO, this was not why Irish men wear skirts now. Fyi, those are not skirts!

That lasted for a mere 1 month? I'm gonna state obvious reasons - (1) He found there was too much aeration circulating his manhood (2) He finds it too revealing of his manhood without additional layer of uhm, underwear. (3) Freedom was not on his side, whenever he jumped, the skirt would "fly" only to...(refer to reason #2) (4) Maybe they just didn't look convincing enough.

Enuff said, again, I'm not saying they don't go on girls as well because of the above reason please refer to the disclaimer yet again. I guess he abandoned it and it got picked up by some popular fashion designer only to evolve to female clothing for obvious reasons yet again?

"Thompson McSkirt" or "Skirt Lee Ha Ha" might be one of your contributors to the invention of skirts, how would I know, I'm theorising. It was well worth it bar none.

Have theories of your own? Share them!

Sunday, July 12, 2009

3 Things

1) The new site(s) are up and running for Akouein, tho still undergoing minor enhances. @Blogspot and @Facebook. So do check those out and link them up.

2) I'd like to thank those who made IU Day Summit Performance a success.

3) Thats all, Thanks.

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Stage 1 Clearance

The Live Onslaught June 8 / June 9
  • and Howie hits a homerun! Request is being weighed and considered. Now to settle another obstacle... 10 minutes ago
  • Do I consider it as debate, nah, I beg to differ. 16 minutes ago
  • I'm in wordplay situation. Every single word matters. 16 minutes ago
You just need half an hour, and a lil' bit of debating spirit instilled. I got stage 1 clearance out of 5 stages! What is it regarding you ask? Check back sometime later to find out!

Hint: (I reckon 1 month to get all 5 done with...shiiiiiiit, it also marks the end of a much speculated event)

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Note to self 070709

1) With future disc brake component you won't have to worry about power braking at sudden visual tight turns. (By the way, it WILL and HAS the potential to lock up wheels)
2) Add Math is confusing when you don't eat enough, eat more before attempting sudden jolts.
3) The front susser shouldn't be locked downhill, Wheeee
4) The doi'ng, doi'ng, doi'ng spring thingy majigy should be attempted in class more often.
5) This is random, but who cares, it's a NOTE TO SELF
6) I should write more of these...yeah, good plan.

-End-

Sunday, July 5, 2009

Project - "The Balance"

Today opened up a whole new perspective in getting something for the darn right of earning it. You might not get what I am trying to blabber in the next couple of paragraphs, but bare with me.

I'm picturing myself deciding on menu listings in Nandos (yes, thats what I can think of now). 1/4 chicken, 8 bucks ish or a slab or two of sidelines along with it for 14 ish. It's 6 bucks worth of difference, but that slab could well satisfy my hunger.

My 1/4 chicken priority is an upfront Rm3000
My sidelines are well over an additional Rm1600
My verdict is Rm4600?? not impossible but the timeline exists as shortened or lengthened.

You could well say, (1) "wow what a spoilt brat" - I'm working towards getting it, are you? (2) "Why something so costly?" - It's what I prioritise and what I need, well planned, and without it, it's meaningless. (3) "Don't everyone need everything?" - Very true, but if you're one of those who contributed a milestone for me to achieve it, you will know.

My point is this, I have a hard time avoiding sidelines, and I can say, we all do. The main course is well targeted with a headshot marker as if it was Counter Strike, but it's how long before I achieve it while I finish eating my sidelines.

I lay out a list each month of what I prioritise, very effective I must tell you. By the end of the month, I strike out those that no longer interest me, it's that sudden impulse when you see something when the affection only lasts a few days. I can easily put 5 items on it in just 2 days, only to find 1 at the end of the month, or sometimes none by the end of the week. Then i sort them out in priority, another strike marker for those unneeded-s.

Today, I realise my sideline was right in my face, a headshot of 1600 - the best option for the balance of future expansion and current specifications. I won't bother giving details here, but you are welcomed to ask, it's not really interesting for you I can say.

The only 2 items left on my monthly summary of prioritised required items, comes to the sum of 4600. Gosh I so need more strength and self discipline than I already have with cash.

I consider (1) having more home cooked breakfasts - saves more than eating out so I won't have to worry about hunger in the noon (2) drinking more water bottled from home - so I don't have to get more from outdoors and keep my hydrated and hunger-free (or at least I think) (3) bring more home contained food - cut back from eating out (4) cycling to designated hang out spots eventho I might stink - don't have to look for public transport, exercise and sacrifices have to made right?

I call this Project "The Balance" otherwise known as PTB, and it starts on Monday. Yes! So don't ask me why I bring more bottled waters around or home made food.